How to write a superb literature review

Literature reviews are important resources for scientists. They provide historical context for a field while offering opinions on its future trajectory. Creating them can provide inspiration for one’s own research, as well as some practice in writing. But few scientists are trained in how to write a review — or in what constitutes an excellent one. Even picking the appropriate software to use can be an involved decision (see ‘Tools and techniques’). So Nature asked editors and working scientists with well-cited reviews for their tips.

Access options

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

196,21 € per year

only 3,85 € per issue

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Interviews have been edited for length and clarity.

Updates & Corrections

• Correction 09 December 2020: An earlier version of the tables in this article included some incorrect details about the programs Zotero, Endnote and Manubot. These have now been corrected.

References

1. Hsing, I.-M., Xu, Y. & Zhao, W. Electroanalysis19, 755–768 (2007). ArticleGoogle Scholar
2. Ledesma, H. A. et al.Nature Nanotechnol.14, 645–657 (2019). ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
3. Brahlek, M., Koirala, N., Bansal, N. & Oh, S. Solid State Commun.215–216, 54–62 (2015). ArticleGoogle Scholar
4. Choi, Y. & Lee, S. Y. Nature Rev. Chem. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-020-00221-w (2020). ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Related Articles

Subjects

Latest on:

Massive Attack’s science-led drive to lower music’s carbon footprint

Career Feature 04 SEP 24

Tales of a migratory marine biologist

Career Feature 28 AUG 24

Nail your tech-industry interviews with these six techniques

Career Column 28 AUG 24

Why I’m committed to breaking the bias in large language models

Career Guide 04 SEP 24

Binning out-of-date chemicals? Somebody think about the carbon!

Correspondence 27 AUG 24

No more hunting for replication studies: crowdsourced database makes them easy to find

Nature Index 27 AUG 24

Publishing nightmare: a researcher’s quest to keep his own work from being plagiarized

Intellectual property and data privacy: the hidden risks of AI

Career Guide 04 SEP 24

t afford the fees?" />

How can I publish open access when I can’t afford the fees?

Career Feature 02 SEP 24

Jobs

NOMIS Foundation ETH Postdoctoral Fellowship

The NOMIS Foundation ETH Fellowship Programme supports postdoctoral researchers at ETH Zurich within the Centre for Origin and Prevalence of Life . Zurich, Canton of Zürich (CH) Centre for Origin and Prevalence of Life at ETH Zurich

13 PhD Positions at Heidelberg University

GRK2727/1 – InCheck Innate Immune Checkpoints in Cancer and Tissue Damage Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg (DE) and Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg (DE) Medical Faculties Mannheim & Heidelberg and DKFZ, Germany

Postdoctoral Associate- Environmental Epidemiology

Open Faculty Positions at the State Key Laboratory of Brain Cognition & Brain-inspired Intelligence

The laboratory focuses on understanding the mechanisms of brain intelligence and developing the theory and techniques of brain-inspired intelligence. Shanghai, China CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology (CEBSIT)